A little over a year ago, we
posted a couple of articles addressing some of Catholic apologist John
Martignoni’s newsletters. The articles
can be found here:
Martignoni also has a series
of videos titled, “Questions Protestants Can’t Answer.” We recently ran across one that we would like
to comment on. This is from his Question
#21 and the video can be found here:
The question revolves around Matthew
19:12:
For there are some eunuchs, which were
so born from their mother’s womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made
eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for
the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is
able to receive it, let him receive it.
So, Martignoni’s question is,
“Who is Jesus talking about here?”
He seems to automatically
think that Jesus is speaking of a very specific group, organization, or
denomination here. And since this
doesn’t “fit the profile” of Baptist, Evangelical, Methodist, or
non-denominational ministers (at least he says that he is not aware of any), he
seems to think that it is obvious that
Jesus must be speaking about the priests of the Roman Catholic Church here. He must be speaking of the Latin Rite in the
Catholic Church. According to
Martignoni, it is these Roman Catholic priests who “fulfill” Jesus’ words in Matthew
19:12.
While we agree with John
Martignoni that here Jesus is speaking about celibacy (abstaining from sex), we
cannot agree with Martignoni’s conclusion.
This passage is not about members
of one particular denomination or organization who are celibate. We find no such thing in Scripture. It is about individuals from all walks of life with a special gift from God
(the ability to abstain from sex in order to devote one’s total focus and
energy on serving God). This is the Protestant
answer to Martignoni’s question.
Does Martignoni think that no one apart from the Roman Catholic
Church is celibate? Or, if not, does he
feel that they are not important enough to mention? Must it
be that God could only be referring to a group or organization of
celibates? No, indeed.
But Martignoni’s logic would
be like the Mormons saying that Jesus’ words in Luke 24:32 (“Did
not our heart burn within us?”) are specifically referring to THEM
(with their famous “burning in the bosom” reference). Just because they can identify with the words
of Jesus does not prove that Jesus is speaking specifically of the Mormon
church.
Or it would be like a particular
Baptist church saying that John the baptist immersing
people in baptism (Matthew 3:16; Mark 1:10) is a reference to their church, specifically, since they do the same.
Of course, that is
ridiculous, but this is what John Martignoni is doing. He seems to be pretending that Jesus is referring only
to Roman Catholic priests. But no, you
cannot apply a scriptural text to yourself and act as though God is referring specifically to your group just
because you have, or do, something similar to what’s in the text. Sorry, John, it’s not all about you and your
church.
Furthermore, Martignoni also
mentions that the celibacy in this verse applies “whether they are currently
single or currently married.” But we
would contend that this cannot
be. It cannot apply to those who are
married, since those married are obligated
to tend to the sexual needs (“due benevolence”) of their spouses (1
Corinthians 7:3, 5). Matthew
19:12 is speaking of those who voluntarily choose to not be encumbered
with the responsibilities of a spouse and family. It is unwise and unbiblical to marry and then
try to be celibate for the rest of your life.
So, Martignoni’s statement about those “currently married,” yet
celibate, is wrong. Jesus’ point is IF
YOU HAVE THIS GIFT, then, and ONLY then, should you abstain from marriage / sex
to serve God more fully.
But we believe that there are
many in the Catholic Church (and also in Protestant and Orthodox churches) who
have thought that they had this gift, but were sorely disappointed when they
found out they didn’t. No doubt, much
damage has been done to the cause of Christ because of this. So, if you think that you have this gift, you’d
better make sure!
Conclusion
Catholics, like Martignoni,
are quick to “see themselves” in certain passages of Scripture. In too many places in the Bible, they think
that they see certain unique teachings of their own church when there is no
such reference. They’ll try to force
Catholic meaning into such verses. This
is simply a pitiful attempt to legitimize the Roman Catholic Church.
It would not be so
objectionable if John Martignoni had said, “We, as Roman Catholics, follow and
obey that particular Scripture in Matthew 19:12.” But it is altogether arrogant to say that God
is speaking specifically about his church when there are, undoubtedly, others
who also “fulfill” that passage.
Again, there is no special
organization or class of priests that Jesus is speaking of here.
Not only is John Martignoni’s
question easily answered by Protestants, but it also reveals that he is simply
assuming / reading something into the text.