There are
many important choices that we must make in life. For example, we need to make decisions on
which career to follow or which college to attend. Where should I live? Whom should I marry? How many children should we have? Etc., etc.
But more important than all of
these decisions are the ones that directly affect your eternal
destination. According to the Bible, all
human beings (whether they believe it or not) have an eternal soul that will exist
forever, and at the end of this life it will go to one of two places – to a
place of eternal punishment, or to
one of eternal life (Matthew
25:46). And one of the things
that can significantly affect your eternal destiny is the church you attend.
There are
many churches out there, and someone may well ask, “But which one is the right one, i.e., which one is teaching
the truth?” Seems like a logical
question. After all, nobody wants to end
up being wrong on eternal matters, do they?
Yet, many people (including some Protestants, some Catholics, and some
otherwise) don’t really care about those things right now. They’re only living for today, but they feel that
they are safe as long as they go to church somewhere. But this is a false security. Jesus said,
“You must be born again…” (John
3:3), i.e., you must allow God to change your heart and your life, and
trust in the fact that Jesus paid the penalty for your sins on the cross. Going to church is important, but trusting in
church attendance (or any other good works) will not save you.
But where can
we locate the true church, the one teaching the whole truth? Of course many of us know that the Catholic
Church claims to be that “one true church” possessing “all the fullness of
truth.” And maybe some other groups will
claim something similar, but our focus here will be on the Catholic Church’s
claims of identifying itself as the one true church.
According to
the Catholic Church, there are four “marks” of the true church, i.e., the true
church must be “One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic” (Lumen Gentium, Paragraphs
8 and 26). And supposedly, not only is the
Catholic Church the only one that has a valid claim on all four of these
features, it is the only one that reflects the fullness of these four marks.
In light of
that claim, this article will be the first of four on these identifying marks,
but today we will focus only on the first mark – the Catholic Church’s claim of
being “one” in unity. They tell us that
the Catholic Church is an “undivided church” (Lumen Gentium, Paragraph
23) with an “undivided episcopate,” or leadership, (Paragraph 18), and that it
possesses an “undivided charity” (Paragraph 32). So, the Catholic Church thinks very highly of
itself and its unity.
Is church
unity important? Yes, Jesus wants His
church to have unity (John chapter 17), but He wants UNITY
IN THE TRUTH. What is the truth? He lets us know in this same chapter when He
tells the Father, “Thy Word is truth…” (Verse 17). He wants our beliefs, our actions, and our
unity to first of all line up with His Word (the Scriptures). But this, by itself, disqualifies the Catholic
Church from being the one true church, since they have many teachings that
either contradict the Bible, or are absent from it, as this blog has
demonstrated over and over. Therefore,
any unity they may have is pretty much irrelevant at this point. Having all the unity in the world is not
going to help if your doctrine is not based on Scripture. So what
if they have common participation in certain ceremonies, or have the same basic
sermon on the same day of the week in every country, or they are reciting the
same mechanical prayers? Having such a
unity proves nothing if you’re neck-deep in error.
Some
Catholics mockingly point to disunity in Protestant (and other) churches, and
make great and inflated claims of their own unity, and then try to use this as
proof that they are the one true church.
Please understand, there certainly are divisions in Protestantism; it is
unfortunate and we’re not denying that. But
the truth is that there is much division
in the Catholic Church, as well. One
need only search the internet to verify this fact. There are popular Catholic apologists who
disagree with each other on many issues, for example, the significance and
effects of the Second Vatican Council, salvation outside the Catholic Church,
the New Mass, evolution, contraception, and the list goes on and on. There are disagreements on all levels. In days past, there were even popes who
anathematized (condemned) one another. So, they are really not the “undivided
church” they claim to be. Catholics seem to claim some kind of
supernatural unity, but their unity is no better than the unity found in many
other groups.
So, if
having divisions disqualifies Protestants (and others) from being part of the
true church, then it also disqualifies the Catholic Church from being the one
true church. You can’t use an argument
that defeats your own position.
See also
here:
In defense
of their unity, they will say, “But 1) the Catholic Church is found in every
country in the world, and it is the largest Christian church on earth, 2) we
have one single human leader who can settle disputes when they come up in the
church, 3) we are the only church that has all the proper sacraments, 4) we
have the same readings weekly in every Catholic Church in the world, and 5) we
have apostolic succession! All this is
evidence that we are the one true church.”
Ok, let’s
break down this last paragraph:
1) Just
because the Catholic Church is large does not prove that it is the right church. Being a majority does not help in spiritual /
eternal matters. Remember, Jesus said
that narrow is the gate that leads to
everlasting life, but wide is the gate that leads to destruction (Matthew
7:13-14). Being in the majority
doesn’t help those poor souls entering the wide gate.
2) And their
having a “single human leader” (the pope) also proves nothing. It seems that such an important
characteristic of the one true church would be quite evident in the Bible, but
the office of “pope” is entirely missing from the pages of the New
Testament. It might sound good, but it’s unbiblical.
3) Concerning
the “proper sacraments,” see here:
4) Having
the same “gospel readings” in every one of its churches on the same days really
proves nothing, as well, since any group could do the same thing if they really
wanted to.
5) And of
course their claim of having a legitimate, lawful, and uninterrupted chain of
popes in “Apostolic Succession” is interesting, but lacking in truth.
See here:
Catholics
will also tell us, “But those who are causing divisions in our ranks are ‘not
truly Catholic,’ so these divisions don’t count.” Well, it’s very convenient to try to exclude
those who disagree with you, but if they are “not true Catholics,” then why
does the Catholic Church still count their attendance and take their weekly
offerings?
It’s hard to
claim exclusion of these from your church who still claim to be Catholic,
attend Mass, give offerings to your church, and have never been excommunicated. Maybe someone needs to tell them that they
are “not really Catholic,” even though the Catholic Church still treats them as
though they are.
But ANY group
or church can make such claims of unity by excluding those who disagree with
them! The fact still remains… there are
divisions in the Catholic Church, and they are not as “unified” as they claim
they are.
And concerning
the use of the term “the church,” you can’t limit the description of the church
to a single denomination or organization or label – that’s not what “the church” is.
The church of Jesus Christ cannot be contained or identified in that
way. The Catholic hierarchy has an
inflated view of itself and they often imply that THEY are “the Church.” For example, they will often use the term
interchangeably with their own hierarchy / leadership. But the term is never used of “the leadership only” in Scripture. The “church” (meaning “called out ones” in
Greek) is made up of all true Christians throughout the world, not just those
in a particular group or organization, and not just the leadership. So, asking the “location” of the true church
is starting out with the wrong premise. And
finding the “right” church is nothing more than finding a local church whose
people truly believe, and live according to, the Scriptures.
Conclusion
Is Catholic
unity all it’s cranked up to be? Is the
Catholic Church really “one”? There is
nothing special about their kind of unity.
Only their claims are special. Just know that there are many arguments and
much confusion within its walls, in spite of its apparent unity.
Now, we don’t
have a problem with the “four marks” themselves, that were mentioned above, but
the Catholic Church certainly cannot claim that all four marks only apply to them.
Actually, we would say with assurance that NONE of these marks (in the
manner that they claim) apply to them.
They are not “one” in the way they claim, and we will go on to
demonstrate in this series that the other three marks do not apply to them in
the manner they believe, either.
The thing I couldn't agree with you more on is the unity in error we see in the RCC. Nowhere in Scripture do we see any evidence that unity dictates doctrine. If that were true then Christ would have been subject to the teachings of the Pharisees. Just because billions of people around the world celebrate Lent, go to confessional, pray to Mary, etc. does not justify these teachings as being true. Appealing to unity in belief does not make it a valid belief.
ReplyDeleteI have a friend who is a devout Catholic (FSSP). He recently invited me to mass and I agreed to go. He attends tridentine mass. It shocked me to hear the priest downplaying novus ordo mass. Through discussions with my friend I was aware of the differences in tridentine mass vs novus ordo mass. He had told me things like Latin mass is more extraordinary while “new mass” is more ordinary, Latin mass is more “in line” with RCC teachings, and Latin mass is simply better than novus ordo mass. His comments to me and the priest’s comments as well did not display any form on unity amongst Catholics. As you pointed about above, new mass is an area of disunity despite what practicing Catholics may argue.
Hello John,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comments.
We certainly agree that the Catholic Church is not as unified as they would like everyone to believe. And the New Mass issue is just one of many issues in that church where there are divisions. Let’s continue to share the truth with them (and others, as well). Thanks again and God bless you and your ministry.
In His Name,
Russell
Russell
ReplyDeleteyou should always make a distinction between Extraordinary and Ordinary teachings of the Magisterial. these we all agree on otherwise one ceases to be Catholic. then there is what is called Authentic Magisterial we allowed by the Church herself to disagree even with highest offices on Authentic issues because these change over time. the fights you see in the Church are on the later not the former two.
there are only 2 Divisions one of Catholics faithful to tradition and others who are affected by a heresy called modernism, its a matter of time until this heresy is defeated and we will be back to normal again, but for protestants the divisions will always be there.
you have misrepresented here "The Catholic hierarchy has an inflated view of itself and they often imply that THEY are “the Church.” For example, they will often use the term interchangeably with their own hierarchy / leadership. But the term is never used of “the leadership only” in Scripture."