CAN THE POPE BE TRUSTED?

Let’s rewind back to March 2021.  The Associated Press published an article saying that the Vatican, under the authority of Pope Francis, issued a formal response to the question of whether the Catholic Church could bless gay unions.  And the answer, according to the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in a two page explanation published in seven different languages, was that the Catholic Church COULD NOT bless the unions of two men or two women because “God cannot bless sin.”  See here:

https://apnews.com/article/vatican-decree-same-sex-unions-cannot-bless-sin-077944750c975313ad253328e4cf7443

Of course, those pushing the LGBT agenda were disappointed, while many staunch Catholics were pleased.  But this has been the official long-standing teaching of the Catholic Church since the beginning.

Ok, fast forward to December 18, 2023, when this same pope did a complete turnabout and made another formal declaration allowing Catholic priests to now bless same-sex unions!  The Associated Press calls it a “radical change in Vatican policy,” and so it is.  The article said that the pope’s reasoning was that people seeking God’s love and mercy should not be subject to “exhaustive moral analysis.” 

Well, that may be true, but the real analysis should be focused, in this case, on the pope and his complete reversal of his previous formal declaration.  In two short years, Pope Francis’ view changed from “God cannot bless sin” to “God does indeed bless sin.”

So, can one formal Catholic declaration nullify another formal Catholic declaration only two years later?  It certainly seems so.

But in an attempt to do damage control, the pope said that this ritual of blessing such couples was not to be confused with the sacrament of marriage.  See here:

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/pope-says-priests-can-bless-sex-couples-radical-change-vatican-policy-rcna130236

It appears that this new document offers an “extensive definition” of the term “blessing” in Scripture.  Yes, as is often the case, the Catholic Church is playing fast and loose with certain biblical terms.   Apparently, it is now ok to bless perverted and unbiblical lifestyles.  But is the Church also willing to bless murderers, whoremongers and slave traders (1 Timothy 1:9-10) in their chosen lifestyle?  How about blessing the lives of idolaters, thieves, drunkards and swindlers (1 Corinthians 6:9-10)?  If not, then why not?  Aren’t these offenders listed together in the Bible with homosexuals?  Yes, indeed (read the two Scripture passages I just quoted above).  So, if one of these lifestyles is wrong, they are all wrong!  Let’s be biblically consistent. 

But it seems that being consistent with Scripture is not high on the list of the pope’s agenda.

What is His Agenda?

So how does this work?  From the Catholic Church’s standpoint, does this mean that the priest can now encourage and even bless the union of a gay couple, but it is not ok to bless them in marriage?  But why bless a homosexual “union” at all, if you are not willing to go all the way?  It’s either right in the eyes of God… or it’s not.  The pope needs to choose one and stick with that choice. 

But blessing these unions in any way is an approval, an acceptance, of their ungodly behavior.  The pope, because he knows it is very controversial, is not fully accepting homosexual marriages at this time.  Francis should show the world what he really believes.  The question is, will he side with the God of the Bible or will he refuse to because of some global agenda? 

This is just an incremental game he’s playing.  It is pretty obvious to me that the pope will indeed cave in somewhere down the line and eventually allow such “marriages.”  It’s just a matter of time.  When the winds of change are strong enough, and he convinces enough people, I believe the pope will reject the Scriptures and justify homosexual marriages.  But I am certainly glad that many Catholics are standing against the pope on this issue.

He wants to embrace the idea so that he can appease one group, and yet he is distancing himself from it to appease another group.  He is trying to please both sides.  As they say, he wants to have his cake and eat it, too.  But either way, this “cake” will cause his downfall, either in the eyes of God, or in the eyes of the LGBT crowd.

A few months ago, I posted an article addressing the pope’s views on homosexuality and dealt with it in more detail.  See here:

https://answeringcatholicclaims.blogspot.com/2023/09/the-pope-on-homosexuality.html

How to Actually Handle This Sin

In another NBC News article on this topic, the pope is quoted to have said, “We cannot be judges who only deny, reject, and exclude.”  See here:

Pope Francis signals he's open to blessings for same-sex unions by Catholic priests (nbcnews.com)

If you’ll notice, people who are constantly trying to justify their sins will often say things like what the pope said just above.  They will quote Matthew 7:1 – “Judge not, that ye be not judged,” and say, “See!  Jesus, Himself, says you can’t judge me!” 

But while it is true that Christians should not just alienate and exclude people for selfish reasons, it is right to exclude them for biblical reasons.  It is also true that Jesus commanded us to judge people, i.e., to be fruit inspectors.  Yes, judging rightly (John 7:24) is indeed a biblical mandate.  

Furthermore, Jesus commanded us to treat those in the church WHO REFUSE TO REPENT OF THEIR SIN as outcasts (Matthew 18:15-17), including the sin of homosexuality.  But this alienation is only exercised by the church after first trying to reconcile them to God.  They must first point out the offender’s sin.  And if he refuses to confess his sin, they should approach him with witnesses, and if he still refuses to listen, he must be brought before the church (the local assembly).  And if he’s still unrepentant, he should be excommunicated for his refusal to turn from his sin, and the whole local assembly is obligated to treat this person as an outsider (unless and until he repents).  If the Catholic Church (or any church) wants to be biblical about this, they would confront homosexuals about their open sinful lifestyle in the manner prescribed by Jesus in Matthew 18.

Just Being Respectful?

Trying to excuse the pope’s action, some say that Francis, up to now, held back on his present view out of respect to honor his predecessor (Benedict XVI), who was more conservative.  But since Benedict XVI is now dead, the new pope can move in the direction he sees fit.

See here:

https://slate.com/human-interest/2023/12/pope-francis-same-sex-relationships-blessing-backstory.html

Whether that’s true or not is pretty much irrelevant.  If Francis is really concerned about honoring his more conservative predecessor, he would maintain the previous pope’s ideals.  But because he hasn’t, I think that this is just an excuse and that he really doesn’t care what Pope Benedict XVI believed.  Remember, he has an agenda to follow.

Repent While There is Time

At the beginning of this article, Francis was quoted as saying, “People seeking God’s love and mercy should not be subject to ‘exhaustive moral analysis.’” 

Two things I want to address here.  First, the pope is assuming that those in a gay union are seeking God’s love and mercy.  But the simple truth is that if someone really wants to seek God, he will humbly recognize his sin (from the Scriptures) and turn away from it.  If he really wants God’s love and mercy, he will abandon his sinful lifestyle.  But if he refuses to do this, then this just proves that he is really not concerned about seeking God at all.  He just wants God’s love and blessings, but refuses to get it on God’s terms. 

He, like the pope, wants to have his cake and eat it, too.  He wants to do whatever his sinful heart desires, but also have God’s approval in doing it.  But the truth is the acceptance that gays so desperately desire will never be found apart from God’s way of doing things.

Secondly, it is true that no one can prevail in an “exhaustive moral analysis.”  We are all sinners (whether homosexual or heterosexual) and we all deserve Hell.  We all fail the test when analyzed.  And yes, as humans, we should not analyze someone simply to throw his sin in his face, or to be “holier than thou.”

The reason we point out someone’s sin should be out of compassion (Jude 1:20-23) and to make him aware of the danger – so that he can repent and ultimately avoid the Lake of Fire.  Pointing out sin (in the right spirit) is actually an act of love.  I understand that it is never pleasant when someone points out a person’s sin and it may be easy to get offended.  But it is better to be offended now and end up in Heaven than to pacify your feelings now, and later suffer an eternity apart from God (Revelation 20:11-15).

Conclusion

To all those who are in the LGBT camp, this pope is not doing you any favors by promoting this lifestyle.  There are so many supporters of gay rights out there who are more concerned with your present feelings than with your eternity.  If I didn’t care, I’d remain silent and never talk about it.  But this lifestyle of unrepentant homosexuality is indeed spiritually dangerous and will draw you away from God… just like the unrepentant heterosexual can be drawn away by his own lusts, as well.  Both end up in Hell. (1 Corinthians 6:9)

So, can Pope Francis be trusted?  Is it ok for a man of such power and influence to formally make two absolutely contradictory Church declarations? Does this “Vicar of Christ” really care for your soul?  I will leave you to ponder these questions.   

 

 

THE POPE ON HOMOSEXUALITY

 

Jorge Mario Bergoglio, also known as Pope Francis, is from Argentina and is recognized as the first Jesuit pope the Catholic Church has ever had.  He has been in office now for about ten and a half years and his reign has been a highly controversial one.  For one thing, his views on homosexuality have been in dispute.

In an interview with the Associated Press on January 25, 2023, concerning gays, he stated:

“We are all children of God, and God loves us as we are and for the strength that each of us fights for our dignity.  Being homosexual is not a crime.  It is not a crime.” 

The pope does acknowledge that homosexuality is a sin, but He added:

“It’s also a sin to lack charity with one another.”  See this link:

https://www.usccb.org/news/2023/pope-clarifies-remarks-about-homosexuality-and-sin

But let’s unpack his comments to see what the pope is really saying. 

Child of God or Child of the Devil?

First of all:

He says that “we are all children of God.”  But that’s just false.  We are indeed all part of His creation, but so is the devil.  So, by that same reasoning, shouldn’t God be obligated to love the devil and call him His child, as well?  Of course not. 

It is also true that humans are made in the image of God (Genesis 1:26-27), and we have to recognize and respect that truth, but simply being made in the image of God doesn’t stop the majority of humans from missing Heaven (Matthew 7:13-14).

So, no, we are not all children of God.  The apostle John tells us:

“But as many as received Him, to them gave He power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on His name.” (John 1:12)

Just because you were born into the human race doesn’t mean you are a child of God.  Those who have NOT received Him nor believed on Him are NOT His children.

No Need to Change?

The second point: 

Pope Francis says that “God loves us as we are.”

Yes, He loves us all in the general sense; that’s why He came to die for the sins of mankind:

“For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son…” (John 3:16). 

But you are not an object of His affection (in the sense of being His child) if you insist on staying in your sins.  He is longsuffering and loves you enough to chastise you for your sin and to give you time to seek Him.  But Jesus also tells us that we are to repent of (turn away from) our sins (Luke 13:1-5), not look for an excuse to stay in them.  Yet, the pope seems to be “helping” homosexuals to do exactly that – to find an excuse to continue in that lifestyle.

Yes, God loved us “while we were yet sinners, and died for us” (Romans 5:8), but that love can, and will, turn to judgment if we ignore or trivialize God’s commandments.

Twisted Honor

Third point:

The pope said that God loves us “for the strength that each of us fights for our dignity.”

The word “dignity” means “the state or quality of being worthy of honor or respect” (Oxford dictionary, online):

https://www.google.com/search?client=avast-a-1&q=dignity+definition&oq=dignity&aqs=avast.1.69i57j0l7.506323276j0j15&ie=UTF-8

But there is nothing “honorable” or “respectable” about unrepentant sin, whether it is homosexuality or any other sin.  What the pope is saying sounds good, but it is deceptive and, due to his worldwide influence, will certainly cause many to end up in Hell.

So You’re Not a Criminal…

Fourth point:

He says that “being homosexual is not a crime.”  That’s true (in America, at least), but you can’t always defend something simply on the basis of it being “legal.” 

Because of the pope’s statements, many people will no doubt reason in their hearts that if it’s not a crime, then it’s ok to do.  But that line of reasoning fails when considering the sin of abortion.  Abortion (until just recently) had not been considered a crime since 1973 when it became legal in the U.S.  Ever since then, the Catholic Church rightly seems to have been officially against it.  Actually, most Catholics would have been up in arms if someone had said that abortion was ok since it was “not a crime.”

Consider also Adolf Hitler’s reign of terror in Germany.  He “legally” established the Holocaust, and it was the law of the land to turn Jews (and others, including homosexuals) over to the authorities to be exterminated.  But the great majority of people today see that as greatly sinful, even if it was “legal” in Germany.

So, you can’t soften the impact that homosexuality has on society simply by saying it’s “not a crime.”  In fact, it is indeed a sin/crime in God’s eyes, just like every other sin. 

True Love Corrects

And the fifth and final point:

Pope Francis said, “It’s also a sin to lack charity with one another.”

Here, the pope is basically saying “You are a Christian and you are supposed to be showing love to gays instead of condemning them!”  This is usually the type of response that people use when their sin is exposed and then they demand, “Don’t you judge me!  Even Jesus said not to judge!”  But we don’t want to see people in error, and see them pay the consequences.  The fact is, if we really love them, we will try to correct them.

Ok, so why does the sin of homosexuality seem to demand more “charity” from Christians than other sins?  It seems that you don’t see nearly as many adulterers, drunkards, or thieves go out of their way to demand that you show them charity, doesn’t it?  I think that this is because they know what’s expected of them and they know that what they’re doing is wrong – that’s why they try to hide it.  But it seems that many in the homosexual community just don’t want to admit the “wrongness” of their lifestyle.  They no longer hide it, and continue in their sin openly, even cheering others on who do the same:

“Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.” (Romans 1:32)

Yes, Christians are indeed supposed to show mercy and love (charity) to those who are caught up in this sin (or any sin), lest we ourselves fail to live up to God’s standards (1 Corinthians 10:12).  But if there is no repentance involved, there is no obligation for the church to coddle them in their sins.  Again, Jesus gave us a model to follow in dealing with unrepentant people in the church (Matthew 18:15-17).  And we should use this model for all types of sin, homosexuality included.

Many people still don’t believe that the LGBT lifestyle is actually a sin.  So right now I will turn to the Scriptures to demonstrate the sinfulness of homosexuality, lesbianism, bi-sexuality, the transvestite lifestyle, etc, etc.  I know that there are other designated letters/numbers to add to the LGBT title, but I am simply using “LGBT” to cover all the bases.

Homosexuality is Indeed a Sin

At the risk of sounding cliché, I want to be clear that we should love the sinner, but hate the sin, as the Bible tells us.  I, personally, have a number of friends who are gay/lesbian.  Most of them are basically “good” people (according to worldly standards), some of whom would help you any time you asked.  They are generally nice, friendly and giving.  To their credit, the ones that I am friends with do not try to shove their sinful lifestyle down anyone’s throats.  They mind their own business and mostly remain friendly.  I have had discussions with them concerning their lifestyle.  Some are less open than others, and it grieves me that they don’t always want to listen to the gospel.  But I pray that every single person in that lifestyle who reads this, does so prayerfully and with an open mind, to remove any doubt as to whether God sees homosexuality as sin or not.

Genesis 18:20 – The angels who visited Abraham tell him that the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah (homosexuality) is great, and they go to visit the city of Sodom.

Genesis 19:1-10 – We all know the story of how God destroys the two cities of Sodom and Gomorrah (and their neighboring cities – Jude 7).  It is obvious what the sin is: the men of the city want to have relations with the two newcomers in town (angels mistaken for men), and they threaten Lot if he doesn’t turn the two over to them.  The city is then completely destroyed and only righteous Lot and his two daughters escape safely.

Some people argue that the sin of Sodom was not homosexuality, but a refusal to be hospitable to the angels.  They’ll say that the people were only guilty of wanting to FORCE themselves onto their targets.  They tell us that it would have been ok if it would have been CONSENSUAL homosexual sex.  But Scripture, taken together as a whole, tells us otherwise.

Leviticus 18:22 – Male to male sex is an abomination to God.

Leviticus 20:13 – Same as above, but adds the death penalty for both of them.  Note that no one is advocating the legal killing of homosexuals today (at least they shouldn’t be).  These civil laws were specifically given for the Jews, and for that specific period in history (the Old Testament).  It does not mean that they must be punished civilly today in the same way as they were back then.  Thank God for grace! 

However, not only was this sin condemned in the Old Testament, but the recognition of its depravity is also carried over into the New Testament.  Yes, God still considers this sin an abomination, just as He did then. 

First of all, Jesus was very clear concerning God’s intention for mankind and sexuality from the beginning:

Matthew 19:3-6

v. 3 - “The Pharisees also came unto Him, tempting Him, and saying unto Him, ‘Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?’ 

v. 4 - “And He answered and said unto them, ‘Have ye not read, that He which made them at the beginning made them male and female,

v. 5 - “And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?

v. 6 - “Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh.  What therefore God has joined together, let no man put asunder.”

Again, Jesus makes it clear that God’s intention from the very start was for one husband (male) to have one wife (female).  These two would be “one flesh,” joined together by God.  Two males (or two females) will never be considered “one flesh” in the eyes of God, nor can they produce children.  This sin is totally unnatural and would eventually cause society to unravel and crumble, as it has already done in other cultures.

Romans 1:26-27 – Clearly talks about forbidden sexual relations between men with men, and women with women – calling it unnatural /indecent/shameful acts and dishonorable/degrading/vile passions.  It doesn’t get much clearer than this.

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 – This passage lists homosexuality with many other sins (fornication, sodomy, idolatry, adultery, theft, drunkenness, reviling, covetousness and extortion).  They are deceived and unrighteous and THEY WILL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD.  Their destiny is very clear.

1 Timothy 1:9-10 – Again, homosexuals are listed with the lawless, rebellious, ungodly, sinners, unholy, worldly, murderers (even of parents), sexually immoral, slave traders, liars, perjurers, and whatever is contrary to sound doctrine.  Note that the sin of homosexuality (considered “mild” today) is in the same camp as murder!  You cannot say it is not sinful!

Jude 7 – It says that Sodom and Gomorrah indulged in sexual immorality/perversion/fornication/unnatural vice and they went after “strange flesh.”  They (the people who engage in this sin) are headed for eternal fire.  Note that Jude 4-14 is speaking of the condemnation of those who rebel against God’s stated design and purpose.  This is exactly what homosexuality is about.

There may be more verses on this issue, but these pretty much sum up God’s attitude on this topic.

The Church is a Hospital for Sinners

It would be different if a person is struggling with the sin of homosexuality, and trying to get out of that lifestyle.  Then we (the church) should have mercy on him and do what we can to help him.  Just like any other sin, a person may occasionally have a lapse and fall into that sin, but if he is indeed a Christian, he will definitely have an inner conflict and be earnestly fighting to overcome that sin. 

But if he loves the sin and doesn’t really care what God thinks about it, willing to stay in it and even do it openly, then that’s a problem.  The rest of the church should approach him and treat him as an outsider (if he remains unrepentant), as Jesus instructed (Matthew 18:15-17). 

But if he is indeed repentant, the rest of the church should lovingly help and encourage him, to get him back on the right path (Galatians 6:1; James 5:19-20).

Conclusion

According to one source, the pope wants gays to feel welcome in the (Catholic) Church.  Furthermore, the pope has even told one gay man, “God made you like this.” 

See here:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/20/pope-juan-carlos-cruz

We just saw the list of sins of which homosexuals are a part.  Would the pope also say to the murderer, “God made you like this”?  Or to the liar, idolater, or drunkard?  God does not make a person gay, just as he doesn’t make him with any other sinful characteristics.  Sin is something each of us chooses to do.  You can’t blame God for your sinful condition.  If God “made them that way” then why should they feel the need to repent?

It looks as though the pope is trying hard to protect unrepentant homosexuals and let them feel ok about their sin.  There is plenty homosexuality within his own Church and he knows it.  He knows that this is a sin, but it seems to bother him that the Church has always (officially, at least) been against homosexuality.

Again, what the pope is saying is deceptive, and he will have to answer for that.  And so will many others who live in and promote this sin.

 

“LET US PREY” (RAPE, SODOMY AND PEDOPHILIA IN THE CATHOLIC HIERARCHY)

Recently, a storm has been brewing in Pennsylvania and it involves members of the Catholic Church.  But the focus wasn’t on the average Catholic in the pew.  The focus was on a Pennsylvania grand jury report, in “the most exhaustive investigation of the church taken on by a state,” accusing over 300 priests of sexual misconduct, abusing more than 1000 children. 

Not only were there priests involved, but there were monsignors, bishops, archbishops, and even cardinals, either directly involved in sexual misconduct themselves, or involved in a deliberate cover-up of the ordeal.

According to one website:

“Instead of contacting law enforcement, senior church officials would regularly shuffle offending priests from parish to parish, where they would continue to have contact with minors.”

https://www.vox.com/2018/8/20/17759694/pope-francis-catholic-sex-abuse-scandal-pennsylvania-report-apologizes

According to this same source, less than a week after the Pennsylvania grand jury report came out, Pope Francis formally apologized for the church’s mishandling of the sex scandal.  Yeah, that’s way too little, way too late.  Not impressive at all.  We don’t think that anyone that high up could be unaware of the things that are going on in his own church.  Pope Francis, as well as the previous popes, should have started weeding out these perverts long ago.  But now, hundreds and hundreds of victims have already been damaged. 

Another source states:

“It is time to face the horrible truth: The Catholic church is a pedophile ring.”

“… the grand jury report includes, but is by no means limited to, the case of a ring of pedophile priests in Pittsburgh, who raped their male victims, took pornographic pictures of them and marked them by giving them gold crosses to wear so that they could be easily recognized by other abusers.”

Concerning the Catholic Church’s cover-up of these crimes, this same source said:

 

“These strategies used to subvert stories of abuse were so common that the FBI reviewed a significant portion of the evidence collected and received by the grand jury and found a series of practices engaged in by church leaders to conceal the truth.  For instance, church authorities who documented the cases for internal use never used the word ‘rape,’ only ‘inappropriate contact.’  Investigations were conducted by other clergy members, rather than trained personnel.  Church-run health centers, not lay psychiatric facilities, were used to examine priests accused of pedophilia.  Housing and funds were provided for priests, even when it was known they were raping children.  Priests were moved from the area only if their communities found out, to other communities where the abusers and abuses were not known.  Most importantly, the hierarchy was instructed to not inform law enforcement about abuses reported by parishoners, but to consider any such case an ‘internal personnel matter.’”

And finally:

“What the now-multiple Pennsylvania grand jury reports show clearly is that the Roman Catholic church has treated the protection of its pedophiles, rapists and sexual abusers as their highest priority.”

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/grand-jury-report-about-catholic-priest-abuse-pennsylvania-shows-church-ncna900906

One source sums it up this way:

“Mitchell Garabedian, who represented many of the Boston victims… added that the report, ‘lays out the standard blueprint of dishonesty, immorality, criminality and cover-up of the Catholic Church which has been previously revealed in Boston and archdioceses and dioceses worldwide.’”

http://www.mcall.com/news/breaking/mc-nws-grand-jury-report-catholic-dioceses-20180612-story.html

Much more has been revealed through many media sources on this investigation, but sadly, this is just the tip of the iceberg.

Ok, so since there are so many problems with sexual perversion in the Catholic Church, could there possibly be something wrong with the Catholic system, itself?  Is there a problem with the structure of the hierarchy, or maybe with the environment that is produced therein?

According to the following Catholic source, there is indeed a problem with the environment in which priests are placed:

“Even if a seminarian’s homosexuality isn’t ‘deep-seated,’ it will likely become deep-seated when he is placed in an all-male environment for five to eight years, and sleeping in bedrooms with men.  Putting homosexuals in an all-male environment is what’s called ‘an occasion of sin,’ that is, it leads to deep-seated temptations.  You might as well put heterosexual men in the convent or a nunnery for five to eight years, and let them sleep in bedrooms with girls and women, and see how long they remain chaste.” 

https://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/a02uDocument_Vree.html

A friend once asked me if I had ever seen a masculine looking priest.  Neither of us could honestly answer yes to that question, even though we both live in a heavily Catholic area.  We’re not saying that all priests everywhere are feminine looking, but it appears that at least the great majority are!  

But why is that?  Do they purposely ordain gay or feminine priests in the Catholic Church?  This is what one source revealed:

“According to a news story in The New York Times (Sept. 15, 2005), Fr. Thomas Reese, S.J., the former Editor-in-Chief of America, said that ‘with the shortage of priests, the church can hardly afford to dismiss gay seminarians.’”

https://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/a02uDocument_Vree.html

So, it seems that they don’t really have a problem ordaining gay men into the Catholic priesthood, in spite of the fact that homosexuality is a sin (Genesis 19:1-29; Leviticus 18:22; 20:13; Romans 1:24-27; 1 Corinthians 6:9-10; 1 Timothy 1:9-10; Jude 7).  So with the type of men they are recruiting, and with the environment that these men are subjected to, is it any wonder that all these things are now surfacing?

A "TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE SYSTEM”

Today we would like to share an article by popular author, pastor and Bible teacher John MacArthur of Grace Community Church in Sun Valley, California.  He is also the creator of the “Grace to You” media ministry.  

In this article, MacArthur shares a candid and historically-based overview of certain aspects of the Roman Catholic Church.  The article is quite long, but well worth reading (also available in audio).  It is titled, “The Scandal of the Catholic Priesthood,” and it covers aspects of the Catholic Mass, the Eucharist, celibacy, nuns, monasteries and homosexuality… but in particular, the tragic plight of the priest.  Roman Catholic priests are locked into what MacArthur calls a "terrible, terrible system.”  They are not only victims of a deceptive and unbiblical religious system, but they are also victims of a cruel environment that fosters bondage to worldly lusts.

Let us all pray for their eyes and hearts to be open to the simple and freedom-producing gospel of Jesus Christ.

See the article here:

http://www.gty.org/resources/sermons/80-264/the-scandal-of-the-catholic-priesthood