All right,
in Part 1, we covered a few basics on water baptism, stressing the fact that
baptism is a good work that every true Christian should do, but that it does not save him. We also stressed the fact that Scripture must
be taken as a whole so that we don’t
make it contradict itself.
Today, we
will go over Bible passages that certain groups (Catholics, Orthodox, some
Protestants, and even some cults) will often use to try and prove that water
baptism is necessary in order to be saved.
So, let’s get started.
Acts 2:38:
Then Peter said unto
them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the Name of Jesus Christ for
the remission of sins and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
There is
much debate over that little word “for” (Greek, “eis”) in this verse. On the surface, it certainly looks like Peter
could be suggesting that baptism is “for” (i.e., to cause) the forgiveness of sins.
But could there be any other possible meanings of this Greek word, or is
this the only way it can be used? Most
Greek words are very precise, but the fact is, most people don’t realize that
this tiny Greek word, translated “for” in Acts 2:38, is used in a wide variety
of ways. Some will insist that it means
“to cause” in this passage, so they believe that baptism causes salvation (the forgiveness of sins). But we would insist that “eis” can be translated
as “because of” in this context, and that Peter was simply telling them to repent,
which would then cause salvation, and then they should get baptized as a demonstration
of their faith and identity with Jesus Christ.
So, what
evidence do we have that “eis” could mean “because of” instead of “to cause” in
Acts
2:38?
1) First of all, this word has MANY meanings in Scripture, e.g., “into,” “to,” “unto,” “in,” “at,” “for,” “on,” “toward,” “against,”
“among,” “upon,” “purpose,” “result,” “aim,” “ground.” It could
also mean “with respect to,” “as regards,” “on the basis of,” “in reference to,”
“because of,” etc. (Sources: Strong’s
Concordance; A. T. Robertson’s Word Pictures of the New Testament; The KJV New
Testament Greek Lexicon; all online)
So, although one translation of this word can be “to cause,” it is certainly
not the only one. Looking to context and
observing the whole of Scripture will greatly help in determining the correct
understanding in each case.
2) We have examples of Scripture using
this same Greek word to mean “because of.”
For example, the people of Nineveh repented at (“eis”) the preaching of Jonah (Matthew 12:41); their
repentance did not cause Jonah’s preaching, but rather, they repented BECAUSE
OF Jonah’s preaching).
Matthew 3:11 says that John the Baptist baptized with water unto (“eis”) repentance. This verse is not saying that baptism causes repentance, but that a person is baptized
BECAUSE OF his repentance. We know that
there are some who get baptized just for show, just to please a friend, parent,
spouse, etc., and are just going through the motions with no repentance, and
with no real intention to serve God.
Their baptism is meaningless. So
obviously, baptism itself does not cause
repentance. Repentance is caused by God
changing man’s heart. And being baptized
without first repenting is worse than useless; it is deceptive and harmful to
the gospel.
Another phrase using “eis” with the same basic meaning as “because of” is
“for this purpose,” and we can find it in a number of Bible verses: John
18:37; Acts 9:21; 26:16; Romans 9:17; Colossians 4:8; 1 Peter 4:6; 1 John 3:8.
3) There are clear biblical examples of
people getting saved before ever getting water baptized, e.g., in the case of the
Ethiopian eunuch, Acts 8:35-38; the apostle Paul, 9:17-18; Cornelius and
his many friends, 10:42-48). There are no
cases in the Bible where an unsaved person, a non-believer, gets baptized. Repentance / salvation must always precede baptism.
4) If it meant “to cause,” it would contradict
many clear Bible verses that tell us that one is saved by faith, apart from the
merit of his works (Romans 3:28; 4:2-6; 11:6; Galatians 2:16; Ephesians 2:8-10; Philippians
3:8-9; Titus 3:5, etc., etc.).
It is also ironic that in this same verse (Acts 2:38), Peter refers
to the free GIFT of salvation, given by the Holy Spirit, and yet, these groups
tell us that salvation is through a work,
i.e., the performance of a ritual (baptism).
But no one works for a gift. If he does, then it is simply not a gift, but
something earned! (Romans 4:4-5; 11:6) And
this would be a contradiction of terms.
See the
links in Part 1 of this series here:
So, there
are good reasons to believe that “eis” in Acts 2:38 means “because of” the
remission of your sins, rather than “to cause” the remission of your sins. Peter is saying to first repent / believe,
which will bring about forgiveness, as God gives you the Holy Spirit, changes
your heart, and makes you eligible for baptism.
The same principles above (at least
number 3 and 4) will equally apply to all other “baptism verses,” because we
must never violate the principles of a well established major doctrine of
Scripture (i.e., salvation by faith apart from the merit of one’s works - Romans
chapter 3, 4, and 5) in an attempt to prove another doctrine. Scripture is always consistent with
itself. And since this topic is actually
about justification and what causes it, we would refer the reader to the “Owner’s
Manual” Analogy, which can be found in the following article:
Mark 16:16:
He who believes and is
baptized shall be saved; but he who believes not shall be damned.
And they’ll
say, “You see! We need both belief and baptism to be saved!”
If
this were the only passage on baptism, salvation, and the role of works in a
Christian’s life, then they might have a good argument. But, as we said before, point #3 and #4 above
make this argument void.
But
are we supposed to trust the type / shadow / symbol (of baptism) for salvation,
or the substance (Jesus’ work and
suffering on the cross)? Saying that we
need to trust both to be saved is adding to the cross, something that Paul
sternly warned the Galatian church against (Galatians 1:8-9; 2:4, 16, 21; 3:1-3,
11, 22). See here:
Baptism
is related to salvation, but it
should not be mistaken for a requirement
for salvation.
Acts 22:16:
And now why do you
tarry? Arise, and be baptized, and wash
away your sins, calling on the Name of the Lord.
Here, the
apostle Paul is retelling the story of his conversion and Ananias’ instructions
to him. According to a number of Greek
scholars, the original language in this verse says, “…having called on” His name.
In other words, it is past tense; it is something done previously. So, the “calling on His name” was done first, bringing forgiveness and
salvation (Romans 10:12-13), before the baptism was ever accomplished.
And this is
exactly how it happened with the apostle Paul.
Notice that when Ananias first received his vision from the Lord, he
called Paul “this man” (Acts 9:13). But when he later actually laid hands on Paul
(known at that time as Saul), Ananias then called him “Brother Saul” (Acts 22:13), demonstrating that God
had revealed to him that Paul was saved during his three days of blindness (before his baptism). Therefore, it is the calling on His name that
causes the washing away of your sins, not baptism. Once again, it was believing / repentance /
faith / salvation BEFORE baptism.
Romans 6:3-4:
Know you not, that so many of us as
were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into His death? Therefore we are
buried with Him by baptism into death that like as Christ was raised up from
the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of
life.
Galatians 3:27:
For as many of you as have been
baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
1 Corinthians 12:13:
For by one Spirit are we all baptized
into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and
have been all made to drink into one Spirit.
Colossians 2:12:
Buried with Him in baptism, wherein
also you are risen with Him through the faith of the operation of God, Who has
raised Him from the dead.
These types of passages
are similar in that they all mention baptism.
But remember, as
we stated in Part 1, not all references to “baptism” are speaking of water baptism. Once again, water baptism is a sign or symbol of the reality
of what happens in the heart of the believer.
He should already possess what
baptism is symbolizing for him. The fact is, a person is “baptized
into Christ” the moment he believes.
Water baptism is just a physical expression of what happens
spiritually. To put it another way, baptism
is a token, like a wedding ring. A man wears
a wedding ring, not TO GET married, but he wears it because he IS ALREADY
married.
So,
none of these Bible verses make the case for this false doctrine of baptismal
regeneration. We will continue our study
in Part 3…
