WHO GETS TO INTERPRET THE BIBLE? (Part 2)

 

Last time, in Part 1, I asked this same question and pointed out that the Catholic Church claims to be able to authentically interpret the Scriptures, and even to be the ONLY entity to be able to do that! (CCC #100)

In essence, they claim to have an infallible Magisterium who can provide certainty in their interpretations.

I can understand why Catholics would embrace that idea.  And I must admit, at first glance, an infallible interpreter does sound like a great concept.  After all, who wants to have poor biblical interpretations, right? 

But the concept of an authentic/infallible interpreter is a slippery slope which gives a false sense of security, causing an unbiblical over-dependence on one select group of fallible humans.  But is this really a reliable safeguard?  Can any denomination, group, or church guarantee such infallible interpretations?  According to the Bible itself, no.

Handle with Care

First of all, the “need” for infallible interpretations is only a perceived need.  Now, we certainly don’t want anyone using random or haphazard interpretations when reading the Bible, nor should we be flippant when doing so.  We should approach God’s Word with the utmost respect, common sense and a commitment to reading it in context.  When doing so, the consistency of Scripture can be seen and we can have confidence in what the Holy Spirit is showing us, in spite of our fallibility.  Again, there is no person or group in the post-apostolic church who can exercise infallibility in moral or doctrinal matters.  But we can have sufficient certainty in our interpretations.

Scripture Interprets Scripture

A person can be wrong on some of his theology, and yet still be right with God, and it is also possible that a brand new Christian could understand a passage that a mature Christian may have been struggling with for years!  Maybe we’re just not listening to the Holy Spirit like we should be (John 14:26; 16:13; Romans 8:14-16).  But I think that often the problem is not so much “hard Scripture” as it is hard hearts!

Of course, there are many things in the Bible that are easily understood – but not everything.  So why would God purposely allow portions of His Word to be so challenging?  I believe whole-heartedly that He wants us to “press in” closer and depend on Him when we have these questions, probing deeper into His Word, rather than trusting in a supposedly infallible group of clerics. 

The Bible has one infallible and ultimate author – God.  And God is consistent with Himself, so He will not contradict Himself.  The same with His God-breathed Word (2 Timothy 3:16).  There is a balance throughout Scripture.  The information on one topic in a certain passage will be consistent with information in other passages on the same topic.  I believe His Word always explains itself – that’s just how He made it.  The patterns within are consistent – we just don’t always see it.  As we often say, Scripture interprets Scripture.  Jesus, Himself, used this principle (Matthew 4:5-7).  The easier/clearer passages help to interpret the harder/less clear passages. 

But how are you going to allow the clear things to help with the harder things if you keep going outside the Bible and putting more emphasis on the church fathers, councils, and church history for your answers?  You’re leaving the infallible “goldmine” to look for information elsewhere in fallible (and sometimes even questionable) sources!  When attention is turned away from our God-breathed source, the chance of error in our interpretation is increased.  Of course church history, the fathers and councils can be of some help, but these are secondary to Scripture.

No Need for Perfection

But when it comes to interpretation, the reality is that we don’t have to know everything perfectly about Scripture – and we don’t have to solve every mystery – there will always be challenges in reading the Word because we are all fallible people.  As someone once said, God’s Word is so simple that a child can understand the basics of it (2 Timothy 3:15), yet it is so deep that a theologian can drown in it (Psalm 119:18; 139:6)!  God reveals His word to us in layers, little by little.  And we will never, in this life, completely mine the depths of His Word.

The Bereans Set the Example

We know that we all need to grow in our understanding/interpretation of Scripture, but the Bible never tells us to look to a Magisterium/central office for infallible interpretations.  In fact, many people feel that the multitude of documents used by the Magisterium are quite complex and harder to understand than Scripture, itself!

A Magisterium may seem to “work better,” but that’s only true if we had a biblical guarantee that this Magisterium was always telling the truth.  But how do you know if they are telling the truth, if not by checking them out with the Bible (1 Thessalonians 5:21)?

Question: By what authority did the noble Bereans test the message that the apostle Paul preached (Acts 17:11)?  They didn’t need any “special authority” or “permission” to do so, but they checked what he said against the Old Testament Scriptures, and apparently understood quite well what Paul was saying – and they weren’t even Jews!  Furthermore, the author of the book of Acts (Luke) commended them for verifying Paul’s message (v. 11)! 

In fact, most of Paul’s epistles were written primarily to gentiles and “lay” people, yet, for the most part, they could understand and interpret his words just fine.  Peter does say that some of the things that Paul taught may have been hard to understand (2 Peter 3:16), but even so, there was no infallible Magisterium needed. 

Is “Private” Interpretation Wrong?

Is there a degree of freedom for Catholics to interpret?  And if so, how does that compare to Protestants?  The difference is this:

Catholics are free to interpret Scripture, AS LONG AS THE INTERPRETATION DOESN’T CONTRADICT THE CATHOLIC CHURCH… while…

Protestants are free to interpret Scripture, AS LONG AS THE INTERPRETATION DOESN’T CONTRADICT SOME OTHER PART OF SCRIPTURE.

Catholics often use 2 Peter 1:20 to try and show that “private interpretation” is a bad thing and that Peter was trying to warn us against it.  But again, if you look at the context, you will find that this is not a warning at all:

(v. 19) “We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts:

(v. 20) “Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the Scripture is of any private interpretation.

(v. 21) “For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.”

In fact, Peter is actually telling us about the truthfulness and reliability of prophecy/Scripture.  Catholics (and others) are missing the whole point of Peter’s words and twist them to say the opposite of his intended message.  Peter is not speaking of one’s reading of Scripture, but it is about the origin of the Scriptures. 

The truth is, we all use private interpretation!  Every person’s interpretation is a private interpretation, no matter what church he goes to.  And there is nothing intrinsically wrong with that, as long as we follow the basic principles mentioned earlier.

See also this link:

https://answeringcatholicclaims.blogspot.com/2014/07/private-interpretation.html

An Empty Promise

A very interesting, honest and informative article was written by Craig Ireland (Australian author, pastor and theological educator).  I would encourage every Catholic to read it.  You can find his article here:

https://craigireland.substack.com/p/the-infallible-interpreter-that-never

In this piece, he said:

“Rome promises what it cannot deliver: certainty without the burden of thinking.  The pitch is elegant and compelling.  Surrender your private judgment to the Magisterium, and, in return, receive access to an infallible interpreter who settles every ambiguity, and protects you from the chaos of competing interpretations.  It is the theological equivalent of an extended warranty.  And like most warranties, it looks better on paper than in practice.”

He also said:

“Protestants openly acknowledge that while Scripture is the final authority, interpreting it requires study, wisdom, and community input.  We argue.  We test interpretations against the text.  We reason together.  Sometimes we disagree strongly enough to separate.  It’s messy.  It’s honest.”

And this:

“Sola Scriptura is not just an arrogant claim that any individual can master Scripture by themself.  It is the honest recognition that Scripture is clear enough on salvific matters, that the Spirit illuminates God’s Word, and where ambiguity remains, Christians may search the text together rather than outsource their thinking to an ecclesiastical authority that can’t even deliver the certainty it promises.  It’s not freedom from interpretive work.  It’s freedom from pretending someone else can do that work for you.”

And lastly:

“… The ‘infallible interpreter’ is a mirage.  Shimmering in the distance, evaporating on approach.”

Very well said!

Although they will never admit this, all of this Catholic stress on an infallible interpreter is two-fold: I believe it is designed to prop up the authority of the Catholic Church, while undercutting the authority of the Scriptures.  It is Satan whispering in the ear of Eve in the Garden of Eden all over again: “Did God really say what you thought He said?  No, you should just listen to me!”

Conclusion

John 12:

v. 47 – “And if any man hear My words, and believeth not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world.”

v. 48 – “He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not My words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day.”

First, notice that Jesus doesn’t say that it is the words of any Magisterium that will judge us in the last day!  John 12:47-48 contains the words of Jesus Christ that were heard orally, but were later put into writing (Scripture).  These were not hard to understand for the people of Jesus’ day.  And they are not hard for us to understand today.

It was mostly the common people who understood, believed in, and accepted Jesus, rather than the educated rulers.  It was those who pressed in and had a hunger for His Word.  The apostle Paul wrote letters to the common people to the churches in Rome, Corinth, Galatia, Ephesus, etc.  His writings were recognized as Scripture, but, for the most part, these believers didn’t need anyone to interpret for them.

When Jesus spoke to the people and used terms like “whosoever,” He wasn’t just talking to the leaders of the church!  The common people were expected to hear the Word of God and understand/interpret it. 

In 1 Corinthians 10:15, Paul said to the local Corinthian church, “I speak as to wise men – judge for yourselves!” (KJV)

Note that many other Bible versions say, “I speak as to ‘sensible people,’” including Catholic versions, like the NAB and NRSV.  He was speaking to the common people (who had common sense) when He said this, not to scholars and lawyers.

So, who gets to interpret the Bible?  Anyone who has surrendered his heart to God and is humbly seeking Him – one who is consistent with his use of Scripture and who allows God to clarify His own Word through the use of other Scripture passages.

If you’re having trouble interpreting the Bible, dig deeper – “It is written again…” (Matthew 4:5-7)

“BY WHAT AUTHORITY...?”

…and they spoke, saying to Him, “Tell us by what authority You are doing these things, or who is the one who gave You this authority?” (Luke 20:2)

After observing the many miraculous signs that Jesus had done in public, the chief priests, scribes, and elders of Jerusalem approached Him while He was teaching in the temple.  They then asked Him by what authority He was doing all these things.  But Jesus detected their trickery, and He masterfully thwarted their question and asked one of His own.  The end result is that they could not answer His question (without either causing a riot or humiliating themselves), so they backed off (Luke 20:1-8). 
 
You see, these people were working closely with the Pharisees, and Nicodemus, the Pharisee, had previously revealed their dirty little secret – that they already knew that Jesus was from God (John 3:1-2), and therefore, had God’s authority.  But their purpose here was to trick Him and to turn the crowd against Him.  But of course, they failed to do so.

A Loaded Question

But we want to point out in this article that Catholics often use this same phrase, “By what authority…”, when confronting Protestants.  Taking their cue from the enemies of Jesus, they use this same question on us concerning Bible interpretation, thinking that this is an effective argument. 
 
Aside from the fact that the priests, scribes and elders were questioning the very authority of God, the Son, and aside from the fact that they were corrupt in their hearts and only wanted to start trouble… at least they applied the question (“By what authority…”) to a more proper object, i.e., Jesus’ miracles and His great wisdom.  But Catholics wrongly apply this same question to Bible interpretation.  That is to say, they are wrong to ask, “By what authority do you Protestants interpret Scripture?”

You see, this is a loaded question.  It’s sort of like asking, “Have you stopped beating your wife yet?”  With this question, whether you answer “yes” or “no,” you are implying guilt even if you are not guilty.  This is because of the way the question is phrased.  It forces you to buy into the false assumption built into it.  So it cannot be answered directly without incriminating yourself.  Asking “by what authority do you interpret…” is similar in that way. 

This is because Catholics start off with a false premise, a wrong assumption, and that assumption is that one needs some kind of “special authority” to be able to interpret Scripture.  But that’s not true at all.
  
No one in the Old or New Testament was ever rebuked for (or discouraged from) attempting to interpret Scripture.  While it is certainly possible for someone to misinterpret a particular passage, no one in the Bible is ever told that they should not interpret – even when they got it wrong (John 5:39-40)!  While Jesus and the apostles often pointed the people to the Scriptures, they never tried to ban anyone from interpreting them because of possible abuse, misunderstanding, or “lack of authority.”  They never said, “No, you need the church’s authority to interpret this!”  This seems to be a Catholic concept, and it is a false one.

Only the Leaders?

So, being able to interpret Scripture has nothing to do with AUTHORITY on our part.  It’s simply something that God expects us to do.  He tells us to interpret (rightly divide) His Word in 2 Timothy 2:15:

“Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” 

But someone may try to argue that in 2 Timothy 2:15, the apostle Paul’s command to “rightly divide” was not to the “laity,” but only to Timothy, who was a pastor / bishop.  But notice that in this same chapter from which we first quoted under the title of this article (Luke 20), Jesus tells a parable to “the people” (Luke 20:9), that is, “the laity,” and He expects them, if their hearts are right, to understand (rightly divide) what He is saying.  And it is absolutely clear that this group of people is separate and distinct from the leaders, i.e., the elders, scribes and priests (v. 1, 6, 19).  So, yes, God does expect the common man, who comes to Him humbly and trusting, to be able to interpret the Scriptures.  So, no special “gift” or “authority” is required for that.  And there are many other passages that confirm this truth.  See a few of them here:

http://answeringcatholicclaims.blogspot.com/2013/07/quick-notes-on-sola-scriptura-part-6.html

Caught in Their Own Trap

Many Catholics believe that any interpretation apart from the Catholic Church’s Magisterium is “private interpretation,” and that this is somehow a bad thing.  But they misunderstand the meaning of the term.  We all have to use our private judgment to interpret and understand Scripture.  NO ONE can avoid private interpretation.  See this link:

http://answeringcatholicclaims.blogspot.com/2014/07/private-interpretation.html

Catholics are setting a trap for themselves that they can’t escape.  At no point in this process do we stop using private interpretation.  Either, everyone must interpret any and all communication that we encounter, or we can’t make any determinations or conclusions about anything.  Are we devolving into solipsism (the belief that we can’t really know anything except that our minds exist)?  But if that’s the case, then no one at all can use Scripture!  

It seems that the problem stems from an unhealthy Catholic concept that says that unless you have a sufficient authority, you cannot be sure what you really believe.  But here is what it all boils down to:  Catholics want “infallible certainty” concerning Scripture reading and interpretation, but that is an impossible request for the post-apostolic church.  See this link:

http://answeringcatholicclaims.blogspot.com/2009/12/dialogue-on-bible-interpretation.html

Conclusion

Although we deny that we can have infallible certainty in our interpretations, this is not an excuse for anyone to interpret the Bible sloppily or carelessly.  Interpretation of Scripture should be done prayerfully, and with reverence and humility toward God (James 1:21).  We all have to start with the right attitude, and use basic hermeneutics (principles of Bible interpretation), context, etc., but the question is this:  Is the resulting interpretation a reasonable and consistent one?  Note that God has not abandoned common sense.

The “by what authority” argument is simply a diversion.  And unfortunately, many times unsuspecting Protestants have unnecessarily fallen victim to this, not knowing how to answer.  But rest assured, we need not be shaken by this false argument.  Trust God’s Word and incline your heart to understand it, and God will not let you down (Psalms 111:10; 119:99-100, 130).

PRIVATE INTERPRETATION

The issue of “private interpretation” of Scripture (also called “private judgment”) comes up quite often in Catholic / Protestant debates.  This article is mainly directed toward Catholics, but it is not just for Catholics, since there are many others who also misunderstand the concept.  The only time the term is actually mentioned in the Bible is in 2 Peter 1:20:

“Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the Scripture is of any private interpretation.”

Many will say that this verse “warns us against private interpretation.”  No, the Apostle Peter was not warning against anything in this verse.  So, let’s put this false teaching to rest, once and for all.  This was not a warning of any kind.  On the contrary, if read in context, one will see that this passage is actually an encouragement about the truthfulness and reliability of Scripture.  Many miss the whole point of this verse and twist it to say what it doesn’t mean.  Note that:

• It is not telling us that we can’t interpret Scripture

• It is not telling us that interpretation is “dangerous”

• It’s not telling us that only a certain organization or “magisterium” can interpret for us

• It is not telling us that only church leaders can interpret for us

• It mentions nothing of a need for “infallibility” when reading the Bible

Many people just assume these things are true from the start.  But let’s look at this passage IN CONTEXT:

2 Peter 1:

v. 18) “And this voice which came from Heaven we heard, when we were with Him in the holy mount.”

v. 19) “We have also a more sure Word of prophecy; whereunto you do well that you take heed, as unto a light that shines in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the Day Star arise in your hearts:”

v. 20) “Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the Scripture is of any private interpretation.”

v. 21) “For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.” 

How can one “take heed” to prophecy (verse 19) if he can’t interpret that prophecy?  Also, why does the apostle compare Scripture to a light (verse 19) if Scripture interpretation keeps us in the dark (as many believe)?  The comparison of Scripture to “light” is meaningless if we can’t interpret its contents.

As any honest Bible reader can see, this passage is speaking of the ORIGIN of the message that God gave to the apostles and prophets and is NOT speaking of the READING of the Bible.  It is speaking of the SOURCE of prophetic Scripture, not the STUDY of it.  The prophets heard from God and, with God’s help, infallibly interpreted that message and infallibly related it to their audience.  The meaning of this passage is simply that Scripture did not originate in the mind of mere men.  It came directly from the mind of God, not from human impulse.

Also, notice (v. 18) that Peter is referring to the time he had personally seen the Lord Jesus transfigured.  (Matthew 17:1-9) This was a very real and personal experience for Peter, yet he speaks of Scripture as an even “more sure word”! (v. 19)

Concerning the definition of “private interpretation,” the Greek words for it simply mean “one’s own interpretation.”  A private interpretation is one that is fallible.  The prophets were not affected by fallibility when they received God’s words.  But all the rest of us today are when it comes to reading Scripture.  So how does the one reading the Bible really know that he is being led by the Holy Spirit?  How does he know that he is arriving at God’s interpretation, as opposed to his own?  Answer:  Your interpretation will be correct if it lines up with the rest of Scripture, with the immediate context and the overall context taken into account.  Yes, and God allows (even demands) common sense be used as well, when interpreting His Word.  Furthermore, history, genre, grammar, etc., also help us to understand.

But according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, a private interpretation is only right when it agrees with (or, at least doesn’t contradict) the Catholic Church (CCC #119).  Interestingly, this would mean that the Catholic can trust his own fallible interpretation of Scripture as long as that interpretation does not contradict his own fallible interpretation of the Church’s dogmatic teachings.  And this is supposed to produce the “infallible certainty” of which they boast?

The Catholic believes that his church’s magisterium has the final word.  But it is Scripture that is the Ultimate Standard for Christians, not any church, denomination, or organization.  (2 Timothy 3:16-17)

According to the online New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia (under “Protestantism”) we read:

“Again, it is illogical to base faith upon the private interpretation of a book [i.e., the Bible].  For faith consists in submitting; private interpretation consists in judging. In faith by hearing, the last word rests with the teacher; in private judgment it rests with the reader, who submits the dead text of Scripture to a kind of post-mortem examination and delivers a verdict without appeal: he believes in himself rather than in any higher authority.”

This is typical Catholic rhetoric.  Catholics say that Scripture can’t be the final authority because it requires interpretation, so we need an infallible teacher to be certain.  They accuse the Protestant of making himself the final interpretive authority, and accuse him of being his own pope.  He is now a judge of the Scriptures, rather than an interpreter.  Accusations abound - but we will soon see the double standard they use.

In all fairness, some Catholics will admit that private interpretation is acceptable and necessary, but many Catholics will say no and create a false dilemma here.  In this case, either:

1) One must have an infallible interpretation by a teacher, or 

2) He will have a wrong interpretation.
   

But these are not the only two options.  Someone can give a fallible interpretation and still be right.  Catholics will often point out that Protestants are “limited” to fallible interpretations, and therefore, have little or no certainty.  But this is a clear double standard, since the Catholic cannot escape this same “dilemma” of using his fallible mind to interpret his sources, whether that source is Scripture, the magisterium, the church fathers, Tradition, or whatever.  It is unavoidable.  All forms of communication must be interpreted.  And all of us have fallible minds and make fallible interpretations.  The truth is, the Catholic has no more certainty in interpreting Scripture than anyone else does. 

 

One way that the Catholic thinks that he can get around the “problems” of fallible interpretations and lack of certainty is by first finding the “True Church” (which, of course, he’ll say is the Catholic Church).  But how do we determine that they are the true church?  He’ll tell us that we must first find it through a study of Scripture, church history, Sacred Tradition, and the church fathers, and this will lead us to an infallible Church who will then be able to tell us correctly what Scripture means.  At this point, we can then rest and never have to worry about our certainty in interpretation any more.

But if you can understand Scripture well enough to “verify” a papal office and its claims of infallibility, and if you can interpret this never-clearly-defined “Sacred Tradition”, and if you can interpret the multi-faceted history of the church, and if you can interpret the teachings of the church fathers (whose language is often harder to understand than the Bible), and if you can piece all of this together to find the “One True Church”… then why couldn’t you just simply interpret the Bible outright?  Ironically, the Catholic Church can’t seem to trust you to interpret the Bible by itself, yet it expects you to be able to go through the long and complicated process above.  But where is the certainty that they so desperately desire in all of this process?  The fact is, in this case the level of certainty is lowered!

The Catholic Church is using very circular reasoning:  They are infallible because that’s what they interpret Scripture to mean.  How do we know that this is the correct interpretation?  Because they are infallible!  Should faithful Catholics believe the Church’s interpretations because they make good sense and because they line up with biblical principles?  No, they want them to believe it because they say so.

CONCLUSION

Even though we all need help interpreting now and then, there is no “special authority” required to interpret the Bible.  Every Christian should be growing in his personal study of God’s Word.  However, it’s not an overnight process; and you don’t have to have a perfect understanding or perfect interpretations of every Bible verse to be pleasing to God.  But God does expect us to interpret His Word when He speaks of “rightly dividing the Word of truth” (2 Timothy 2:15).  We may not have infallible certainty, but we can have sufficient certainty.  Like it or not, when reading Scripture, all interpretations are private interpretations – there may be a lot of people who interpret a passage the same way that you do, but each one of them must still fallibly interpret what they read.

No matter how you slice it, it is always ultimately you who will stand before God… and you (and your interpretations) will be judged accordingly, whether you followed your own ideas or whether you chose to be subject to an authority of some type.  No one will be able to fully blame anyone else on Judgment Day.  If you, as a responsible adult, don’t test all things (1 Thessalonians 5:21) by God’s Word, it will be no one’s fault but your own.

The Bible is inspired by God and it therefore has enough consistency in its texts and in its principles to help us discern what God is telling us.  Otherwise, why would He bother to give it to us?

We encourage everyone to read the Scriptures, both Old and New Testament.  Read them in context and read them slowly, carefully, and prayerfully.  Read them with a humble attitude because they are God’s words to us.  They are words of life, eternal life.

See also:

http://answeringcatholicclaims.blogspot.com/2009/12/dialogue-on-bible-interpretation.html

http://answeringcatholicclaims.blogspot.com/2013/07/quick-notes-on-sola-scriptura-part-6.html